[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: FEniCS still on SVN?



On Fri, 2016-04-22 at 17:50 +0000, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 02:02:34PM +0200, Johannes Ring wrote:
> > 
> > On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 12:01 PM, Mattia Rizzolo <mattia@debian.org
> > > wrote:
> > > 
> > > On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 11:47:28AM +0200, Graham Inggs wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > On 22/04/2016 11:39, Nico Schlömer wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > > I was looking for the Dolfin/FEniCS packages this morning and
> > > > > couldn't find
> > > > > them on /git/debian-science on alioth. Is it possible that
> > > > > they are still
> > > > > provided under svn?
> > > > Here they are:
> > > > 
> > > > https://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/debian-science/packages/fenic
> > > > s/
> > > We can easily import the svn repo inside git, if the actual
> > > maintainers
> > > asks us so, though.
> > I'm happy if someone moves it to git.
> I only now realize that this is actually a suite of packages.
> I assume that you/we would like to work on them as standard gbp
> repository, so I just started the conversion of ffc, dolfin and
> fenics
> (I'll do the others in a second batch), and once finished I'll also
> import the last upstream tarball in the repo.

Thanks for that.  For reference, FENiCS upstream is hosted on git, with
each component in a separate repository, 
https://bitbucket.org/fenics-project/


> For sure this is what me would like to have, but if this is not what
> you would like, I think we'll need to discuss a bit on it, as having
> standard packaging repository is quite helpful.

Yeah, makes sense to keep all the components using the same framework
(and my preference is for git over svn).

The full set of FENiCS source packages in Debian (CORE packages
upstream) is
  fiat
  instant
  ufl
  ffc
  dolfin


Looks like we should probably start packaging mshr.



Drew



Reply to: