Hi Mattia, Quoting Mattia Rizzolo (2016-11-23 01:44:50) > On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 07:14:22PM +0100, Maarten van Gompel wrote: > > Packages ucto and frog have been updated > > accordingly to depend on it (no new upstream). The three packages are ready for upload now. > > starting with frog: > > * git repo is missing the tag for the last upload Added > * please revert eec388092aae834ed4dd6643b524861faca64356 > * and also 941f7477add917bc757d4123cba4336fe94b141e (unless it really > does need a newer ucto dependency, does it really?! the generated > binary dependency is not versioned (and how could it without proper > symbol file...), so I very much doubt forcing a build order between > ucto and frog means really something at the end (if it has issues > building against a ucto built against a different version of libfolia > than the one frog is currently building against, then it should fail > the build; but this is actually a rarer issue that you might think). Ok, so you're saying I don't need to force a higher libfolia version despite the new so version? Will bug https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=843053 still be fixed this way? > * the "[ Name Surname ]" thing in the changelog is only needed if > different people made changes for that single upload; if you're alone > you can remove it Right, fixed > * you have a bunch of trailing newlines in changelog Fixed > for ucto: > > well, not much to do considering I reviewed the last upload :P > Just, don't bump the build-dep. If you have no changes to do in this > package, what you want is a > No-change upload to rebuild against libfolia5 > like we do in Ubuntu; or ask the release team to schedule a binNMU > (which effectively achieves the very same, just bothering more people > for nothing in this case, if you ask me..). Ok, I reverted the changes, it's indeed a no-change upload then, no version number change at all, is that valid? Let's indeed not bother people needlessly. If so, frog and ucto should be in order now. > I'm also waiting for the auto-transitioner to notice the libfolia upload > and create a transition tracker to have more assurance those are the > only 2 rdeps. I'd be very surprised (and very pleasantly so) if a third party uses our library AND packages his software for debian :) But I understand the precaution yes. Ciao, -- Maarten van Gompel Centre for Language Studies Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen proycon@anaproy.nl http://proycon.anaproy.nl http://github.com/proycon GnuPG key: 0x1A31555C XMPP: proycon@anaproy.nl Matrix: @proycon:anaproy.nl Telegram: proycon IRC: proycon (freenode) Twitter: https://twitter.com/proycon Bitcoin: 1BRptZsKQtqRGSZ5qKbX2azbfiygHxJPsd
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: signature