Re: RFS: opm-common/2021.10-3 [QA] -- Tools for Eclipse reservoir simulation files

[Markus Blatt <markus@dr-blatt.de>]

Hi Anton,

thanks a lot for the work. Highly appreciated.

Did you also upload opm-upscaling to NEW?

opm-upscaling/2021.10-1  https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/opm-upscaling

Did not receibve any notification and can't see. Maybe it just needs more
time for processing?

Markus

Am Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 07:14:45PM +0100 schrieb Anton Gladky:
> Hi Markus,
>
> done!
>
> Best regards
>
> Anton
>
> Am Mi., 26. Jan. 2022 um 14:44 Uhr schrieb Markus Blatt <markus@dr-blatt.de>:
> > Hi,
> > Am Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 07:26:09AM +0100 schrieb Anton Gladky:
> > >
> > >I will upload it in the evening. Please prepare all other involved
> > >packages if any. Thanks. Regards
> > >
> >
> > cool. Thanks in advance.
> >
> > Source uploads needed for migration to testing:
> > - opm-common/2021.10-3 https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/opm-common
> > - opm-material/2021.10-2 https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/opm-material
> > - opm-models/2021.10-2  https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/opm-models
> >
> >
> > These are the ones that were rejected by ftpmaster and copyright should be fixed now.
> > Please upload to new
> > - opm-grid/2021.10-1  https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/opm-grid
> > - opm-simulators/2021.10-1  https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/opm-simulators
> > - opm-upscaling/2021.10-1  https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/opm-upscaling
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Markus
> >
> >
> > >
> > >Am Di., 25. Jan. 2022 um 00:00 Uhr schrieb Markus Blatt <markus@dr-blatt.de>:
> > >>
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "opm-common" to do a source upload:
> > >>
> > >>   * Package name    : opm-common
> > >>     Version         : 2021.10-3
> > >>     Upstream Author : opm@opm-project.org
> > >>   * URL             : http://opm-project.org
> > >>   * License         : GPL-2.0+, GPL-3.0+, ODBL-1.0 and DBCL-1.0
> > >>   * Vcs             : https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/opm-common
> > >>     Section         : libs
> > >>
> > >> The package was still not good enough.
> > >> We had limited the architectures in d/control to 64bit, but not in d/tests/control and
> > >> that would have prevented the source package from migrating to testing as the autopkgtests
> > >> for 32bit would still be executed and fail due to missing binary packages.
> > >>
> > >> After a fruitful discussions on the mentors list, see
> > >> https://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2022/01/msg00185.html, I have now
> > >>
> > >> - used "Architecture: any" in d/control to let buildd try to build all (32bit builds will fail due to failing ctest)
> > >> - limited to 64bit architectures in d/tests/control to prevent failing autopkgtest
> > >>
> > >> I hope that this will allow for migration to testing.
> > >>
> > >> Thanks a lot.
> > >>
> > >> Cheers,
> > >>
> > >> Markus
> > >>
> > >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Dr. Markus Blatt - HPC-Simulation-Software & Services http://www.dr-blatt.de
> > Pedettistr. 38, 85072 Eichstätt, Germany,  USt-Id: DE279960836
> > Tel.: +49 (0) 160 97590858

--

Dr. Markus Blatt - HPC-Simulation-Software & Services http://www.dr-blatt.de
Pedettistr. 38, 85072 Eichstätt, Germany,  USt-Id: DE279960836
Tel.: +49 (0) 160 97590858