Re: Proposed refactoring of the per-release tracker pages

[Moritz Muehlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org>]

Michael Gilbert wrote:
> In order to address some usability, clutter, and transparancy issues
> with the tracker, I propose to make the following changes:
> 
> 1.  By default, the per-release pages (e.g. [0]) will only show low,
> medium, and high urgencies.

Plus issues where no severity is set. By default issues which are set
<no-dsa> should not be displayed as well, since they're triaged security-wise.
 
> 2.  All blank urgencies will be converted to "undetermined".

No way. <undetermined> should be used for fishy issues where no sufficient
research has been done (like for the ltdl or expat mass bug filing, where
50% of the initial reports turn out to be false positives). 

As said before the severity is irrelevant, hardly to classify and only
used for some priorisation. They should not be mandatory.

> 3.  A separate page will be added that lists all open undetermined
> issues; separated by affected release.

Ok.
 
> 4.  A separate page will be added that lists all open unimportant
> issues; separated by affected release.

Ok.
 
Cheers,
        Moritz