Re: procfs weirdness on unstable/testing

To: walt <wsheets@sbcglobal.net>
Cc: debian-testing@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: procfs weirdness on unstable/testing
From: Junichi Uekawa <dancer@netfort.gr.jp>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 14:09:23 +0900
Message-id: <[🔎] 20020128140923.21467c8a.dancer@netfort.gr.jp>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 87pu3vcdw7.fsf@sbcglobal.net>
References: <[🔎] 87pu3vcdw7.fsf@sbcglobal.net>

walt <wsheets@sbcglobal.net> cum veritate scripsit:

> debian testing/unstable/sid, current as of 27.Jan.2002 19:00 PST.
> kernel 2.4.13 from kernel.org, no patches, no recent compiles.

Do you know if your system has devfs?

-- 
dancer@debian.org : Junichi Uekawa   http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423  7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: procfs weirdness on unstable/testing
  - From: walt <wsheets@sbcglobal.net>

References:
- procfs weirdness on unstable/testing
  - From: walt <wsheets@sbcglobal.net>

Prev by Date: procfs weirdness on unstable/testing
Next by Date: quota does not enforce quotas?
Previous by thread: procfs weirdness on unstable/testing
Next by thread: Re: procfs weirdness on unstable/testing
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread