[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: problems with dhclient after upgrade to sarge



Hi Klaus,

Thanks for the suggestions. I've tried them out, but still have no joy.

If I try setting a gateway by hand:

ansum:~# route add default gw 66.203.194.255
SIOCADDRT: Network is unreachable
ansum:~#

After reading the man page for dhclient, I checked out my 
/var/lib/dhcp3/dhclient.leases file. It was updated when I restarted 
dhclient and contains

lease {
  interface "eth0";
  fixed-address 66.203.194.60;
  filename "vxworks";
  option subnet-mask 255.255.255.0;
  option routers 66.203.194.1;
  option dhcp-lease-time 10800;
  option dhcp-message-type 5;
  option domain-name-servers 66.203.195.237;
  option dhcp-server-identifier 66.203.195.237;
  option broadcast-address 66.203.194.255;
  option domain-name "cp.telus.net";
  renew 6 2004/4/24 00:03:15;
  rebind 6 2004/4/24 01:13:58;
  expire 6 2004/4/24 01:36:28;
}

So, again it looks like dhclient is getting everything it needs to, but 
the rest of the computer isn't being told that. Any ideas, or should I 
submit a bug report?

Cheers,

David




On Fri, 23 Apr 2004, Klaus Ita wrote:

> Hi David!
>  first of all i forgot on which list that was. maybe you can rereply on
>  the list so others can also gain from our knowledge.
> 
>  maybe (if u are in control of the dhcp-server) the default-gateway is
>  not set?
> 
>  you can influence the routing table yourself. mine looks like that
> 
> 
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination     Gateway         Genmask         Flags Metric Ref    Use Iface
> 192.168.102.0   0.0.0.0         255.255.255.0   U     0      0        0 eth0
> 0.0.0.0         192.168.102.1   0.0.0.0         UG    0      0        0 eth0
> 
> you will definitely need the lower line which you can get with a command
> like:
> route set default gw [so.me.ip.ad.re.ss]
> if you only have one interface. look up in "man route" if you need more
> special setup.
> but that route not found/network unreachable is _always_ a sign that the
> routing doesn't work.
> 
> rather try pinging 66.102.9.104 than www.google.com in order to find
> out if everything works.
> 
> good luck,
> klaus
> 
> * David Ballantyne <ballanty@cita.utoronto.ca> [2004-04-23 22:24:
> 
> > From: David Ballantyne <ballanty@cita.utoronto.ca>
> > Subject: Re: problems with dhclient after upgrade to sarge
> > To: debian-testing@lists.debian.org, debian-subscriber@worstofall.com
> > 
> > Hi Klaus,
> > 
> > Sorry for not responding sooner, but I'm not subscribed to the list, so it 
> > took me a while to find your messeage.
> > 
> > In response to your questions:
> > 
> > > what does 'route -an' give you?
> > 
> > I first ran /sbin/dhclient, and I get all the normal looking stuff. Then 
> > running 'route -n' gives:
> > 
> > ansum:~# route -n
> > Kernel IP routing table
> > Destination	Gateway		Genmask		Flags Metric Ref  Use 
> > Iface
> > ansum:~#
> > 
> > So, there's nothing there.
> > 
> > > what does 'cat /etc/resolv.conf' give you?
> > 
> > ansum:~# cat /etc/resolv.conf
> > search cp.telus.net
> > nameserver 66.203.195.237
> > 
> > Looks normal...
> > 
> > > you are getting an ip, obviously, so maybe try pinging your dhcp server?
> > 
> > ansum:~# ping 66.203.194.1
> > PING 66.203.194.1 (66.203.194.1): 56 data bytes
> > ping: send to: Network is unreachable
> > ping: wrote 66.203.194.1 64 chars, ret=-1
> > ping: send to: Network is unreachable
> > .
> > .
> > .
> > So, even though dhcp seems to be working, the rest of the computer is 
> > etting the message. Does this narrow the problem down at all?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
David R. Ballantyne			             Ph: 416-978-1775
Canadian Institute for
Theoretical Astrophysics	                    Fax: 416-978-3921
University of Toronto,
60 St. George Street,		     Email: ballanty@cita.utoronto.ca
Toronto, Ontario
Canada M5S 3H8		  Web: http://www.cita.utoronto.ca/~ballanty/



Reply to: