[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Problems afer dist-upgrade



Hi,
seems to be some problem with  "libstdc++6" if i try to install
gcc-4.0-base (= 4.0.2-8) apt wants to uninstall apt! and thats not what
i want.

> > that i can't even install "aptitude" "cupsys" and a lot of others.
> > Is testing broken so much or had i make a mistake??
> What prevents you from doing so?  What problems do you experience

kaktus:/home/andi# apt-get install aptitude
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.

Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that
the package is simply not installable and a bug report against
that package should be filed.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
  aptitude: Depends: libapt-pkg-libc6.3-6-3.11
            Depends: libsigc++-2.0-0c2a (>= 2.0.2) but it is not going
to be ins
talled
            Depends: libstdc++6 (>= 4.0.2-4) but it is not going to be
installed
E: Broken packages
kaktus:/home/andi# apt-get install libstdc++6
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.

Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that
the package is simply not installable and a bug report against
that package should be filed.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
  libstdc++6: Depends: gcc-4.0-base (= 4.0.2-8) but 4.0.2-9 is to be
installed
E: Broken packages


Thanks 
Andreas Grabner



Reply to: