Bug#67780: marked as done (foils.cls is gone from tetex)
Your message dated Sat, 19 Aug 2000 13:42:19 +0200 (MET DST)
with message-id <14750.29339.663061.269854@arthur.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE>
and subject line Bug#67780: foils.cls is gone from tetex
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Jul 2000 22:31:09 +0000
>From crusius@cocabeans.stanford.edu Wed Jul 26 17:31:09 2000
Return-path: <crusius@cocabeans.stanford.edu>
Received: from cocabeans.stanford.edu [171.64.92.38] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 2 (Debian))
id 13HZhl-0002BH-00; Wed, 26 Jul 2000 17:31:09 -0500
Received: from crusius by cocabeans.stanford.edu with local (Exim 3.03 #1 (Debian))
id 13HZbI-0003sa-00
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Wed, 26 Jul 2000 15:24:28 -0700
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2000 15:24:28 -0700
From: Cesar Crusius <crusius@cocabeans.stanford.edu>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: foils.cls is gone from tetex
Message-ID: <20000726152428.A14890@cocabeans.stanford.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
User-Agent: Mutt/1.0pre3i
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Package: tetex-nonfree
Version: 1.0-10
The 'foils' package is missing in potato tetex (it was present in
slink), and the package where it should be is tetex-nonfree. The
'foils' package is relatively common and if it is missing it can break
up many TeX installations where people use it.
Linux 2.2.17
libc.so.6
--
Cesar Augusto Rorato Crusius o__ o__ o__ o__ o__
Stanford University ,>/'_ ,>/'_ ,>/'_ ,>/'_ ,>/'_
e-mail:c.crusius@ieee.org (_)\(_) (_)\(_) (_)\(_) (_)\(_) (_)\(_)
www.stanford.edu/~crusius
He who sacrifices functionality for ease of use
Loses both and deserves neither
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 67780-done) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Aug 2000 11:42:29 +0000
>From christoph.martin@uni-mainz.de Sat Aug 19 06:42:29 2000
Return-path: <christoph.martin@uni-mainz.de>
Received: from mailgate1.zdv.uni-mainz.de [::ffff:134.93.8.56]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 13Q71B-0008UE-00; Sat, 19 Aug 2000 06:42:29 -0500
Received: from arthur.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE (arthur.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE [134.93.8.145])
by mailgate1.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id e7JBgLe03670;
Sat, 19 Aug 2000 13:42:21 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: (from martin@localhost)
by arthur.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE (8.10.2/8.10.2) id e7JBgKo16898;
Sat, 19 Aug 2000 13:42:20 +0200 (MET DST)
From: Christoph Martin <martin@uni-mainz.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <14750.29339.663061.269854@arthur.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE>
Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2000 13:42:19 +0200 (MET DST)
To: 67780-done@bugs.debian.org
Cc: Atsuhito Kohda <kohda@nsx.pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp>,
crusius@cocabeans.stanford.edu
Subject: Re: Bug#67780: foils.cls is gone from tetex
In-Reply-To: <14719.57452.844295.493804@arthur.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE>
References: <20000726152428.A14890@cocabeans.stanford.edu>
<20000727082729V.kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp>
<14719.57452.844295.493804@arthur.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE>
X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under Emacs 19.34.1
Organization: Johannes Gutenberg-Universitaet Mainz
Delivered-To: 67780-done@bugs.debian.org
Christoph Martin writes:
> Atsuhito Kohda writes:
> > From: Cesar
> > Subject: Bug#67780:
> > Date: Wed,
> >
> > > Package: tetex-nonfree
> > > Version: 1.0-10
> > >
> > > The 'foils' package is missing in potato tetex (it was present in
> > > slink), and the package where it should be is tetex-nonfree. The
> > > 'foils' package is relatively common and if it is missing it can break
> > > up many TeX installations where people use it.
> >
> > Well I heard that 'foils' is removed from the original teTeX
> > source tree so this might be not a bug at all.
>
> Thomas Esser removed it, because it has a nonfree license.
>
Closing
Reply to: