[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#131916: marked as done ([tetex-bin] install fails due to missing appdefault for xdvi)



Your message dated Sat, 24 Jan 2004 14:57:58 +0100 (CET)
with message-id <Pine.GSO.4.58.0401241457001.24410@galjas.cs.vu.nl>
and subject line Bug#131916: [tetex-bin] install fails due to missing appdefault for xdvi
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Feb 2002 23:44:32 +0000
>From tjzeeman@cs.vu.nl Fri Feb 01 17:44:32 2002
Return-path: <tjzeeman@cs.vu.nl>
Received: from keg.cs.vu.nl [130.37.24.4] (root)
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 16WnM7-000311-00; Fri, 01 Feb 2002 17:44:31 -0600
Received: from localhost by keg.cs.vu.nl with esmtp
	(Smail #71) id m16WnM6-000rYsC; Sat, 2 Feb 2002 00:44 +0100
Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2002 00:44:30 +0100 (CET)
From: "Thomas J. Zeeman" <tjzeeman@cs.vu.nl>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: [tetex-bin] install fails due to missing appdefault for xdvi
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.40.0202020026280.19716-100000@keg.cs.vu.nl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org


Package: tetex-bin
Version: 1.0.7+20011202-3

tetex-bin shows only a message about not being able to find the
app-default for xdvi and then drops out of the debconf-interface.
Since tetex-bin's description claims to install that utility this strikes
me a a bit weird. Maybe add something to the pre-inst script that sets
this app-default?

regards,
Thomas
-- 


	- If Barbie is so popular, why do you have to buy her friends?



---------------------------------------
Received: (at 131916-done) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Jan 2004 13:58:00 +0000
>From tjzeeman@cs.vu.nl Sat Jan 24 05:58:00 2004
Return-path: <tjzeeman@cs.vu.nl>
Received: from galjas.cs.vu.nl [130.37.24.13] (root)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1AkOIS-0004C3-00; Sat, 24 Jan 2004 05:58:00 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by galjas.cs.vu.nl with esmtp
	(Smail #87) id m1AkOIQ-000BGjC; Sat, 24 Jan 2004 14:57 +0100
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2004 14:57:58 +0100 (CET)
From: "Thomas J. Zeeman" <tjzeeman@cs.vu.nl>
To: 131916-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#131916: [tetex-bin] install fails due to missing appdefault
 for xdvi
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 20040121125243.GC4297@preusse-16223.user.cis.dfn.de>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.58.0401241457001.24410@galjas.cs.vu.nl>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.40.0202020026280.19716-100000@keg.cs.vu.nl>
 <[🔎] 20040115105426.GD5889@preusse-16223.user.cis.dfn.de>
 <[🔎] Pine.GSO.4.58.0401210901001.17220@galjas.cs.vu.nl>
 <[🔎] 20040121125243.GC4297@preusse-16223.user.cis.dfn.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: 131916-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_20 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_20
X-Spam-Level: 



On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, Hilmar Preusse wrote:

> On 21.01.04 Thomas J. Zeeman (tjzeeman@cs.vu.nl) wrote:
> > On Thu, 15 Jan 2004, Hilmar Preusse wrote:
> > > http://bugs.debian.org/131916
> > [snip]
> > > Is that bug still valid in current teTeX.
> >
> > A recent installation of Debian didn't show this behaviour, so I
> > think it's solved.
> >
> Would you be so kind to close that bug by sending an E-Mail to
> 131916-done@bugs.debian.org then?

Done.

regards,
Thomas
-- 

	Individual rights are the means of subordinating society to moral law.
	 -- Ayn Rand



Reply to: