Re: tetex-base needs a new orig.tar.gz
On 21.06.04 Frank Küster (frank@kuesterei.ch) wrote:
Hi,
> Ad 2.) Re-add files that we have deleted from the upstream tarball, but
> that are now free
>
> - #176153: g-brief depends on europs.sty which is not included
>
> requires updating of the g-brief package:
>
> doc/latex/g-brief/
> doc/latex/g-brief/g-brief.dvi
> doc/latex/g-brief/beispiel.tex
> doc/latex/g-brief/beispiel2.tex
> tex/latex/g-brief/
> tex/latex/g-brief/g-brief2.cls
> tex/latex/g-brief/g-brief2.sty
> tex/latex/g-brief/g-brief.cls
> tex/latex/g-brief/g-brief.sty
>
Agreed. The europs.sty Dep is solved.
> I suggest adding:
>
> tex/generic/ruhyphen/ruhyphas.tex
> tex/generic/ruhyphen/ruhyphzn.tex
> tex/generic/hyphen/sehyph.tex
> tex/generic/hyphen/cahyph.tex
> tex/generic/hyphen/gahyph.tex
> doc/latex/g-brief/
> doc/latex/g-brief/g-brief.dvi
> doc/latex/g-brief/beispiel.tex
> doc/latex/g-brief/beispiel2.tex
> tex/latex/g-brief/
> tex/latex/g-brief/g-brief2.cls
> tex/latex/g-brief/g-brief2.sty
> tex/latex/g-brief/g-brief.cls
> tex/latex/g-brief/g-brief.sty
>
> + caption files
>
> + fvrb-ex files
>
And from the diff.gz: listings.sty, euler.dvi. After that the uudecode
call in debian/rules is surplus and we can drop the B-D on sharutils.
We could add the patch of newhelpindex.html into orig.tar.gz but I
don't think it is a good idea, as the patch is too Debian-specific
(well, except the first hunk).
H.
--
Troglodytism does not necessarily imply a low cultural level.
http://hilmarpreusse.forum-rheinland.de/
Reply to: