Re: GCC 4.0 as the default GCC / C++ ABI change
On 11.07.05 Florent Rougon (f.rougon@free.fr) wrote:
> Hilmar Preusse <hille42@web.de> wrote:
Hi,
> > So I guess we can do that ASAP. We don't depend on any other
> > ++lib than libstdc++5. Furthermore I suggest to do that only for
> > 3.0 and simply neglect 2.0.2. 2.0.2 won't be contained in etch
> > and we don't provide any C++ libs.
>
> I don't know whether it is intended that libstdc++5 be removed soon
> from the archive (to mark the end of the transition). If yes, tetex
> 2 should also be rebuilt, otherwise its dependencies will force
> libstdc++5 to stay in the archive.
>
Well, I just hoped that teTeX 3.0 has entered unstable *before* the
transition is over. Didn't it take a whole year last time?
H.
--
The answer to the question of Life, the Universe, and Everything is...
Four day work week,
Two ply toilet paper!
Reply to: