Bug#302035: Splitting the teTeX packages
On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 12:39 +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> Sending this mail to the bug for proper archiving.
Thanks, I constantly forget this ...
> > And /usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/dvipdfm/dvipdfm.def
> > looks like a part of graphics ...
>
> I don't think so:
>
> %% This is file `dvipdfm.def',
> %% and was *not* generated with the docstrip utility.
> %%
> %% It was hand edited from several docstripped def
> %% files that are distributed with the Graphics Bundle
>
> This looks to me as if it was derived from the graphics bundle, but is
> not part of it.
Indeed. This is an interesting case. The graphics bundle contains a
dvipdfm.def (CTAN:/macros/latex/required/graphics/dvipdfm.def), but that
one is not present in teTeX! The one in TEXMF/tex/latex/dvipdfm/ seems
to come from the dvipdfm sources. This seems to be a change with respect
to teTeX 2. Looks like a borderline case to me ...
cheerio
ralf
Reply to: