[texinfo] 02/03: call update-fmtutil with --quiet
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
preining pushed a commit to branch master
in repository texinfo.
commit 87b38ccfd34e801e1d9198ed2c97a7685755840a
Author: Norbert Preining <preining@debian.org>
Date: Mon Jun 1 08:52:29 2015 +0900
call update-fmtutil with --quiet
---
debian/texinfo.postinst | 7 +++----
debian/texinfo.postrm | 3 +--
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/debian/texinfo.postinst b/debian/texinfo.postinst
index 5a83c87..a87bfde 100644
--- a/debian/texinfo.postinst
+++ b/debian/texinfo.postinst
@@ -65,9 +65,9 @@ case "$1" in
# present (config files are installed at config time!)
# So we have to check for the existence of this file
# before we can call update-fmtutil
- if [ -r /etc/texmf/fmt.d/00tex.cnf ] ; then
- if which update-fmtutil > /dev/null ; then update-fmtutil ; fi
- fi
+ #if [ -r /etc/texmf/fmt.d/00tex.cnf ] ; then
+ if which update-fmtutil > /dev/null ; then update-fmtutil --quiet ; fi
+ #fi
if which mktexlsr >/dev/null; then update_lsr_files; fi
# tetex might be unpacked but not configured, we have to check
# whether /etc/texmf/texmf.cnf already exists. The following check
@@ -75,7 +75,6 @@ case "$1" in
# 2) whether tex-common is configured.
if kpsewhich texmf.cnf > /dev/null 2>&1 ; then
build_format_if_format_exists --byfmt texinfo
- build_format_if_format_exists --byfmt cyrtexinfo
fi
;;
*)
diff --git a/debian/texinfo.postrm b/debian/texinfo.postrm
index a61427c..b8675e4 100644
--- a/debian/texinfo.postrm
+++ b/debian/texinfo.postrm
@@ -45,8 +45,7 @@ update_lsr_files ()
case "$1" in
remove|disappear)
rm -f /var/lib/texmf/web2c/texinfo.*
- rm -f /var/lib/texmf/web2c/cyrtexinfo.*
- check_run_without_errors update-fmtutil
+ check_run_without_errors update-fmtutil --quiet
check_run_without_errors mktexlsr /usr/share/texmf /var/lib/texmf
;;
purge|upgrade|failed-upgrade|abort-upgrade|abort-install)
--
Alioth's /usr/local/bin/git-commit-notice on /srv/git.debian.org/git/debian-tex/texinfo.git
Reply to: