Bug#850038: marked as done (python-sagetex: Python module not formated properly)
Your message dated Tue, 3 Jan 2017 19:56:17 +0400
with message-id <8602ad8b-c14d-aba7-fb73-0fd8de06b27f@rezozer.net>
and subject line python-sagetex: Python module not formated properly [DONE]
has caused the Debian Bug report #850038,
regarding python-sagetex: Python module not formated properly
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
850038: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=850038
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: python-sagetex
Version: 3.0+ds-2
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
Currently the python-sagetex package isn’t working, for python does not treat the sagetex folder as a module (basically it’s missing an __init__.py). This can be easily fixed by renaming /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/sagetex/sagetex.py to /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/sagetex/__init__.py.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'proposed-updates'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 4.9.0-towo.1-siduction-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=de_AT.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_AT.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
Versions of packages python-sagetex depends on:
pn python:any <none>
ii tex-common 6.05
python-sagetex recommends no packages.
Versions of packages python-sagetex suggests:
pn sagetex-doc <none>
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Dear Valentin, thanks for your bugreport.
The reported issue, among other issues, is fixed in the version 3.0+ds-3 currently at Alioth [1]:
I am waiting for sagemath 7.4-5 ; it is a question of days, if not hours.
Jerome
[1] https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debian-tex/sagetex.git
- --
Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calculus@rezozer.net
AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5 A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=
=Bgd0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
Reply to: