Bug#721626: texlive-base: .pfm files really needed?

To: Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at>
Cc: 721626@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#721626: texlive-base: .pfm files really needed?
From: Hilmar Preuße <hille42@web.de>
Date: Sun, 4 Aug 2019 20:46:31 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] d005e0a3-0cb5-12dc-fb29-2dd23bd050b8@web.de>
Reply-to: Hilmar Preuße <hille42@web.de>, 721626@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <20130902143611.GB5226@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at>
References: <20130902141555.22328.35272.reportbug@kff50.ghi.rwth-aachen.de> <20130902143611.GB5226@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> <20130902141555.22328.35272.reportbug@kff50.ghi.rwth-aachen.de>

Am 02.09.2013 um 16:36 teilte Norbert Preining mit:
> On Mo, 02 Sep 2013, Fabian Greffrath wrote:

Hi Norbert,

>> Debian system that contain .pfm files.
> 
> Can be trashed according to all knowledge I have.
> 
hille@debian-amd64-sid:~$ apt-file search .pfm|grep texlive|wc -l
567

Need help here? Simply blacklisting in
texlive-nonbin/all/debian/tpm2deb.cfg ?

Hilmar
-- 
sigfault
#206401 http://counter.li.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Bug#721626: texlive-base: .pfm files really needed?
  - From: Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at>

Prev by Date: Bug#618033: AW: Bug#618033: texlive-bin-2009: Missing -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 leads to files not opening (x86 /32bit)
Next by Date: Bug#618033: texlive-bin-2009: Missing -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 leads to files not opening (x86 /32bit)
Previous by thread: Processed: reassign
Next by thread: Bug#721626: texlive-base: .pfm files really needed?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread