[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: installing ELF-devel-tools



On Sun, 31 Mar 1996, Maarten Boekhold wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> today I wanted to install the ELF development-stuff, so I got:
> binutils, bin86, gcc, gdb, xxgdb, ddd, libc5-devel, libg++, make, 
> ncurses30-devel, slang-devel, slang-lib from the unstable-tree.
> 
> When doing 'dpkg -i libc5-devel', it failed because of 
> dependency-problems with libc-4.26.8.
> 

The way I have solved this is to uninstall libc and install the libc4 
package from the ELF tree.  This is an updated version and will not 
conflict with libc5 (the ELF libraries).  

> Is it save to use --force-depends in this case? Don't want to screw up my 
> system.....
> 
> I had kind of the same thing with ncurses-devel. It has some 
> dependency-problems with the old ncurses-stuff. What's the story here?
> 

This is because packages have been split up and renamed differently in 
teh 1.1 tree.  I think that the best is to eliminate the old packages 
first and the put in the new ones.

I have just been through a number of "upgrades" to 1.1 and I have found a 
number of packages which fail because of duplicate files in other 
packages.  Using the --force-depends or --force-overwrite options is 
absolutely necessary to get them installed.  In many cases it is just a 
question of a file which is duplicated in two packages (often from the 
0.93 and 1.1 tree which as I have mentioned above, have significant changes).

Good luck!

Carlo



    ***********************************************************************
    *                            Carlo U. Segre                           *
    *      Department of Biological, Chemical and Physical Sciences       *
    *        Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL 60616          *
    *   Voice: (312) 567-3498                      FAX: (312) 567-3494    *
    *                      segre@charlie.acc.iit.edu                      *
    ***********************************************************************



Reply to: