Re: Isn't cc the default compiler?
On 25 Jun 1998 10:24:02 +0200, Brederlow wrote:
>I compiled a lot of packages on my system and often I see that
>programms don't use cc as their compiler. Thus they don't use
>/etc/alternatives/cc.
>Unless somebody tells me a good reason for not using cc I will open
>bugs against any Packages that just uses gcc for fun. I know that some
>Packages need gcc explicitly, but that should be a realy small number.
Uhm, aside from the fact that gcc is now the de facto standard and cc is
considered an aniquated POS?
--
Steve C. Lamb | Opinions expressed by me are not my
http://www.calweb.com/~morpheus | employer's. They hired me for my
ICQ: 5107343 | skills and labor, not my opinions!
---------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: