Re: Netscape and its cache
i for one love netscape. mainly for it's roaming abilities. i setup
mod_roaming on my main www server an can get my bookmarks and cookies and
history files from any machine at any time. at home i use squid for my
cache and i set my cache in netscape to 0. dont remember if netscape still
caches things but it doesnt matter to me, squid works better. although
because of the roaming stuff i do close out netscape when im done using
it, i don't go weeks or days with it open. if i didn't the roaming
information would be out of synch.
nate
----------------------------------------[mailto:aphro@aphroland.org ]--
Linux System Administrator http://www.firetrail.com/
Firetrail Internet Services Limited http://www.aphroland.org/
Everett, WA 425-348-7336 http://www.linuxpowered.net/
Powered By: http://comedy.aphroland.org/
Debian 2.1 Linux 2.0.36 SMP http://yahoo.aphroland.org/
-----------------------------------------[mailto:aphro@netquest.net ]--
On 11 Oct 1999, Arcady Genkin wrote:
> iehrenwald@earthlink.net writes:
>
> > > So it only cleared 700K. This pisses me off. Any ideas, anyone?
> >
> > Netscape's cache features never worked right. Netscape is a stupid and
> > terrible browser.
>
> So, is there a viable alternative? I tried Mosaic, but it lacks some
> important features. I use lynx quite often, but it's only good when
> one wants to read some text pages. Emacs/W3 eats memory like crasy,
> and is slow and lacks features even more...
>
> --
> Arcady Genkin http://www.wgaf.dyndns.org
> "You should seek your enemy, you should wage your war -- a war for your
> opinions. And if your opinion is defeated, your honesty should still cry
> triumph over that!" (F. Nietzsche)
>
>
> --
> Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe debian-user-request@lists.debian.org < /dev/null
>
Reply to: