[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: SECOND TRY: Re: Group "adm"?



On Fri, Oct 15, 1999 at 09:09:52AM -0400,
Ed Cogburn <ecogburn@greene.xtn.net> wrote:
> 
> /home:
> drwxrwsr-x   3 ed       ed           1024 Aug 11  1998 home
> 
> 	I don't know how the above happened for /home.  What should the
> owner/permissions of /home be?
> 

drwxrwsr-x  10 root     staff        1024 Oct 11 04:01 /home

> /home/ed:
> drwxrwxr-x  30 ed       ed           3072 Oct 15 05:41 ed
> 
> 	Its not SGID.  Should it be?
> 

I don't know. I just looked and some of the users have sgid, some don't. I
don't remember setting it myself, so I'm not sure what's going on.

> 	P.S.  The group 'ed' does exist, and it doesn't matter whether user
> 'ed' is a member of 'adm' or not.  'mkdir temp' in /home/ed (executed by
> the user 'ed') always results in the group owner of the temp subdir
> being 'adm'.
> 

This is why I didn't reply to your original post. I have no idea what's
wrong. Sorry.

-- 
Eric Gillespie, Jr. <*> epg@pobox.com

"Man is a rope, tied between beast and overman--a rope over an abyss.
 A dangerous across, a dangerous on-the-way, a dangerous looking-back,
 a dangerous shuddering and stopping."
 --Friedrich Nietzsche

Attachment: pgpkp6Y5OCiOh.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: