RE: hdc: no response (status = 0xd0)
I also had this problem but i left my cd-rom as master and turned on PNP OS
in bios and it worked fine.
Mohammad
> -----Original Message-----
> From: tko@westgac3.dragon.com [mailto:tko@westgac3.dragon.com]
> Sent: Thursday, September 03, 1998 8:53 AM
> To: zlatko.rek@fs.uni-lj.si
> Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: hdc: no response (status = 0xd0)
>
>
> Zlatko Rek writes:
> > I've installed Debian GNU/Linux 2.0 on a new machine from CD. The basic
> > installation went OK, until I made a reboot. After that, the CD drive
> > is not recognized (boot from floppy or disk):
> >
> > ide: i82371 PIIX (Triton) on PCI bus 0 function 57
> > ide0: BM-DMA at 0xfcd0-0xfcd7
> > ide1: BM-DMA at 0xfcd8-0xfcdf
> > hda: WDC AC34300L, 4104MB w/256kB Cache, CHS=523/255/63, UDMA
> > hdc: no response (status = 0xd0)
> > ide0 at 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6 on irq 14
> >
> > but, if I boot from CD and mount /dev/hda2 as root partition,
> the CD drive
> > is recognized:
> >
> > ide: i82371 PIIX (Triton) on PCI bus 0 function 57
> > ide0: BM-DMA at 0xfcd0-0xfcd7
> > ide1: BM-DMA at 0xfcd8-0xfcdf
> > hda: WDC AC34300L, 4104MB w/256kB Cache, CHS=523/255/63, UDMA
> > hdc: ATAPI CDROM, ATAPI CDROM drive
> > ide0 at 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6 on irq 14
> > ide1 at 0x170-0x177,0x376 on irq 15
> >
> > The kernel is from kernel-image-2.0.34_2.0.34-4.deb and I also
> tried with
> > custom kernel, with no success.
> >
> > What to do? Any help is appreciated.
> >
>
> EASY, your CDROM drive does not like being programmed as a "master" drive.
> Reset it to slave mode and put it behind a master hard drive (as
> /dev/hdb). I
> ran into this very same problem myself. After resetting my CDROM
> from "master"
> to "slave", it has performed flawlessly.
>
> --
> -= Sent by Debian 1.3 Linux =-
> Thomas Kocourek KD4CIK
> @_@tko@westgac3.dragon.com Remove @_@ for correct Email address
> --... ...-- ... -.. . -.- -.. ....- -.-. .. -.-
>
>
> --
> Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe
> debian-user-request@lists.debian.org < /dev/null
>
Reply to: