[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: "upgrade" vs "dist-upgrade"



>>>>> "Viktor" == Viktor Rosenfeld <rosenfel@informatik.hu-berlin.de> writes:

    Viktor> You are mostly correct.  IIRC, if the package structure
    Viktor> changes, e.g.  some packages get split up and others are
    Viktor> added, then "upgrade" won't handle that and only upgrade
    Viktor> the packages you have installed.  "dist-upgrade" handles
    Viktor> this case more intelligently.

    Viktor> However, since the package structure in potato (stable)
    Viktor> won't change, "dist-upgrade" and "upgrade" have the same
    Viktor> effect.  An "upgrade" on woody or sid might leave your
    Viktor> system broken, though.

    Viktor> So, if you "upgrade" to woody, better use "dist-upgrade".


If I'm already tracking woody, should I be routinely using "upgrade"
or "dist-upgrade" ?


-- 

Robert Koss, Ph.D.     | Training, Mentoring, Contract Development
Senior Consultant      | Object Oriented Design, C++, Java
www.objectmentor.com   | Extreme Programming



Reply to: