Re: Removing the indent-string quote marker '>' in emails.
On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 11:39:51AM -0700, RobertHoltzman wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 09:26:54AM -0500, Celejar wrote:
> >
> > Is this really true? Is the total amount of upstream bandwidth that
> > spam consumes really that expensive (eSpam in e-mail started to become
> > a problem when the Internet was opened up to the general public in the
> > mid-1990s. It grew exponentially over the following years, and today
> > comprises some 80 to 85% of all the email in the world, by
> > conservative estimate.[specially at the ISP wholesale
> > level) ?
>
> From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spam_(electronic):
>
> "Spam in e-mail started to become a problem when the Internet was opened
> up to the general public in the mid-1990s. It grew exponentially over
> the following years, and today comprises some 80 to 85% of all the email
> in the world, by conservative estimate."
>
It comprises a little over 90% of what hits my filters lately.
--
Kind Regards,
Freeman
Reply to: