Re: Permission Problem with xsane - more
On 08/10/11 01:31, Thomas H. George wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 10:37:04AM +1100, Scott Ferguson wrote:
>> On 06/10/11 01:38, Thomas H. George wrote:
>>> On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 08:57:59AM -0400, Alan Greenberger wrote:
>>>> On 2011-10-03, Thomas H. George <lists@tomgeorge.info> wrote:
>>>> (...)
>>>>>>>> Tell us your scanner model? :-)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Epson Perfection 2400 Photo
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>> (...)
>>>>> Just found the following:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Script started on Mon 03 Oct 2011 03:38:15 PM EDT
>>>>> tom@dragon:~$ lsusb -s 001:005
>>>>> Bus 001 Device 005: ID 04b8:011b Seiko Epson Corp. Perfection 2400 Photo
>>>>> tom@dragon:~$ scanimage -L
>>>>> device `epson2:libusb:001:005' is a Epson GT-9300 flatbed scanner
>>>>> device `epson:libusb:001:005' is a Epson GT-9300 flatbed scanner
>>
>> Alan's post has broken the thread - but in a previous post I mentioned
>> that "The problem seems to be that *both* epson and epson2 backends are
>> being called"
>>
>> <snipped>
>>>> $ grep epson /etc/sane.d/dll.conf
>>> epson
>>> epson2
>>
>> This is where epson *and* epson2 are *both* being called.
>> Comment one of them out.
>> The default on Squeeze is for *only* the epson2 backend to be active.
>>
> I did comment out epson in dll.conf. This did not solve the problem.
>> What was the result of trying the suggested scanimage commands? (in the
>> post you didn't respond to)
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>>
> I did respond to Alan's post repeating all his commands and finding no
> difference in the file permissions. I don't know why that response
> didn't appear in this thread.
It may have, and I may have missed it.
I still can't find your answer to the outcome of running:-
$ scanimage -d epson2:libusb:001:005
and
$ scanimage -d epson:libusb:001:005
No matter if you have it working now.
Apologies for not picking up on you running Lenny.
<snipped>
>
> Tom
>> --
Reply to: