Re: [OT] Regular DKIM issues on this ML (was: Re: why !oh why Debian and application list)
On Tue 16 Jun 2020 at 13:10:38 (+0200), l0f4r0@tuta.io wrote:
> 13 juin 2020 à 21:05 de recoverym4n@enotuniq.net:
> > On Sat, Jun 13, 2020 at 09:01:59PM +0200, l0f4r0@tuta.io wrote:
> >> 13 juin 2020 à 17:12 de recoverym4n@enotuniq.net:
> >> > On Sat, Jun 13, 2020 at 06:10:15PM +0300, Reco wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Let's see.
> >> >>
> >> >> >From what I saw this should fail DKIM test.
> >> >>
> >> >> And, for the good measure:
> >> >>
> >> >> >From: this is not a valid RFC-822 header
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > Ok, clearly I don't have any problem with DKIM on this list.
> >> >
> >> Ok let's see for me as well:
> >>
> >> >From my point of view
> >>
> >> >From: l0f4r0
> >>
> >> l0f4r0
> >>
> > Your e-mail passed DKIM test on my MTA with flying colors.
> >
> > Try that base64-encoded html thing next.
> >
> It was already base64 encoded, see below:
>
> --------------79Bu5A16qPEYcVIZL@tutanota
> Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
> Content-transfer-encoding: base64
>
> PGRpdj4xMyBqdWluIDIwMjAgw6AgMTc6MTIgZGUgcmVjb3ZlcnltNG5AZW5vdHVuaXEubmV0Ojxicj
> 48L2Rpdj48YmxvY2txdW90ZSBjbGFzcz0idHV0YW5vdGFfcXVvdGUiPjxkaXY+T24gU2F0LCBKdW4g
> MTMsIDIwMjAgYXQgMDY6MTA6MTVQTSArMDMwMCwgUmVjbyB3cm90ZTo8YnI+PC9kaXY+PGJsb2NrcX
> VvdGU+PGRpdj5MZXQncyBzZWUuPGJyPjwvZGl2PjxkaXY+PGJyPjwvZGl2PjxkaXY+Jmd0O0Zyb20g
> d2hhdCBJIHNhdyB0aGlzIHNob3VsZCBmYWlsIERLSU0gdGVzdC48YnI+PC9kaXY+PGRpdj48YnI+PC
> 9kaXY+PGRpdj5BbmQsIGZvciB0aGUgZ29vZCBtZWFzdXJlOjxicj48L2Rpdj48ZGl2Pjxicj48L2Rp
> dj48ZGl2PiZndDtGcm9tOiB0aGlzIGlzIG5vdCBhIHZhbGlkIFJGQy04MjIgaGVhZGVyPGJyPjwvZG
> l2PjwvYmxvY2txdW90ZT48ZGl2Pjxicj48L2Rpdj48ZGl2Pk9rLCBjbGVhcmx5IEkgZG9uJ3QgaGF2
> ZSBhbnkgcHJvYmxlbSB3aXRoIERLSU0gb24gdGhpcyBsaXN0Ljxicj48L2Rpdj48L2Jsb2NrcXVvdG
> U+PGRpdj5PayBsZXQncyBzZWUgZm9yIG1lIGFzIHdlbGw6PGJyPjwvZGl2PjxkaXY+PGJyPjwvZGl2
> PjxkaXY+Jmd0O0Zyb20gbXkgcG9pbnQgb2Ygdmlldzxicj48L2Rpdj48ZGl2Pjxicj48L2Rpdj48ZG
> l2PiZndDtGcm9tOiBsMGY0cjA8YnI+PC9kaXY+PGRpdj48YnI+PC9kaXY+PGRpdj5sMGY0cjA8YnI+
> PC9kaXY+
>
> --------------79Bu5A16qPEYcVIZL@tutanota--
It might be easier for people to follow the substance of this thread
if you posted in such a way as to include one simple self-descriptive
test in each post, and not include all the deeply-nested "noise" like
the above. So, for example, you could write:
>From foo. This line was written with a leading unescaped From, "From ".
>From bar. This line was written with a leading escaped From, ">From ".
You could, in addition, include a file attachment of the test as written.
You might also wish to omit/change your Attribution line temporarily,
because it prevents your tests from ever consisting entirely of 7-bit
ASCII, owing to its "à".
These little things might help clarify your reports of the distorting
effects of a medium, when those reports are subject to the same
potential distortion.
Cheers,
David.
Reply to: