[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Periodic refresh (or rwrite?) of data on an SSD (was: Re: Recommended SSDs and 4-bay internal dock)



On Wednesday, January 11, 2023 12:20:05 PM Linux-Fan wrote:
> > Or does one need to read every byte, allocated or not?
> 
> AFAIK one needs to _power_ the device every once in a while and keep power
> connected for some time. Then, the controller can dos all the necessary
> actions in the background.

...
 
> Here is an article from 2021 that shows some typical numbersas I
> remembered them. I do not know anything about this specific source's
> credibility, though:
> https://www.virtium.com/knowledge-base/ssd-data-retention/
> 
> This entry seems to be rather pessimistic:
> https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/potential-ssd-data-loss-after-extended-sh
> utdown

I've read some of that article, or, I guess, really the abstract and the 
section labeled "Content" on that page:

https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/potential-ssd-data-loss-after-extended-
shutdown

I see the statement: "A system (and its enclosed drives) should be powered up 
at least 2 weeks after 2 months of system power off.   If a drive has an error 
indicating it is at end of life we recommend not powering off the system for 
extended periods of time.", and the first quoted paragraph in this email 
reiterates the need to power up occasionally and leave connected for some time 
(so that the controller can do all the necessary actions in the background).

I assume that they are talking about the hardwired controller built into the 
drive, thus there is no particular need to power it up from an OS that 
recognizes it but simply something that powers it somehow?

Can anyone shed more light on what happens during that two weeks -- is the 
data somehow "refreshed" (in place), or rewritten somewhere else on the drive, 
or ???

(Perhaps that is discussed in the complete article of which this appears to be 
just the abstract??)

Thanks!

-- 
rhk 

(sig revised 20221206)

If you reply: snip, snip, and snip again; leave attributions; avoid HTML; 
avoid top posting; and keep it "on list".  (Oxford comma (and semi-colon) 
included at no charge.)  If you revise the topic, change the Subject: line.  
If you change the topic, start a new thread.

Writing is often meant for others to read and understand (legal documents 
excepted?) -- make it easier for your reader by various means, including 
liberal use of whitespace (short paragraphs, separated by whitespace / blank 
lines) and minimal use of (obscure?) jargon, abbreviations, acronyms, and 
references.

If someone has already responded to a question, decide whether any response 
you add will be helpful or not ...

A picture is worth a thousand words.  A video (or "audio"): not so much -- 
divide by 10 for each minute of video (or audio) or create a transcript and 
edit it to 10% of the original.

A speaker who uses ahhs, ums, or such may have a real physical or mental 
disability, or may be showing disrespect for his listeners by not properly 
preparing in advance and thinking before speaking.  (Remember Cicero who did 
not have enough time to write a short missive.)  (That speaker might have been 
"trained" to do this by being interrupted often if he pauses.)

A radio (or TV) station which broadcasts speakers with high pitched voices (or 
very low pitched / gravelly voices) (which older people might not be able to 
hear properly) disrespects its listeners.   Likewise if it broadcasts 
extraneous or disturbing sounds (like gunfire or crying), or broadcasts 
speakers using their native language (with or without an overdubbed 
translation).

A person who writes a sig this long probably has issues and disrespects (and 
offends) a large number of readers. ;-)
'


Reply to: