Re: PROPOSED: [CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT] Alternate disambiguation of 4.1.5

To: John Goerzen <jgoerzen@progenylinux.com>
Cc: debian-vote@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: PROPOSED: [CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT] Alternate disambiguation of 4.1.5
From: ch@lathspell.westend.com (Christian Hammers)
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 23:49:20 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20001010234920.D12276@westend.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] sa7n1gcob5b.fsf@indy.progenylinux.com>; from jgoerzen@progenylinux.com on Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 12:32:00PM -0500
References: <[🔎] 20001010010554.B15226@deadbeast.net> <[🔎] 6585-Tue10Oct2000030029-0500-srivasta@acm.org> <[🔎] sa7n1gcob5b.fsf@indy.progenylinux.com>

Hallo

On Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 12:32:00PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> It seems to me that a 3:1 majority is exceedingly excessive; requiring
> 75% of people to agree seems to me to be an unreasonably high limit.
We talk about changing our constitution! 3:1 is by no means too high.

bye,

 -christian-

Reply to:

References:
- PROPOSED: [CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT] disambiguation of 4.1.5
  - From: Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>
- PROPOSED: [CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT] Alternate disambiguation of 4.1.5
  - From: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org>
- Re: PROPOSED: [CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT] Alternate disambiguation of 4.1.5
  - From: John Goerzen <jgoerzen@progenylinux.com>

Prev by Date: Re: PROPOSED: [CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT] Alternate disambiguation of 4.1.5
Next by Date: Re: current ballot must be withdrawn per Constitution A.5
Previous by thread: Re: PROPOSED: [CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT] Alternate disambiguation of 4.1.5
Next by thread: Re: PROPOSED: [CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT] Alternate disambiguation of 4.1.5
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread