On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 06:10:46PM -0500, Debian Project Secretary wrote: > As I count, this resolution to delay the decition of the DPL > of the withdrawal of the Package Policy Committee delegation has > received 2K sponsors, which means that ? 4.2.2.2 of the constitution > to be called into action. > | 4.2. Procedure > | 2. Delaying a decision by the Project Leader or their Delegate: > | 2. If such a resolution is sponsored by at least 2K Developers, > | or if it is proposed by the Technical Committee, the > | resolution puts the decision immediately on hold (provided > | that resolution itself says so). I can't see anywhere in the resolution it claims to invoke 4.2.2.2, so afaics that doesn't apply. > I am proposing the following draft ballot for this immediate > vote, while I go about setting up the voting infrastructure. The > vote page containing the details of this general resolution is not > yet up, but as soon as it is it would be found at: > http://www.debian.org/vote/2006/vote_008 > Voting period starts 00:00:01 UTC on Friday, 28 Oct 2006 > Votes must be received by 23:59:59 UTC on Friday, 10 Nov 2006 If this immediate vote is compliant with the constitutional requirements (which afaics it's not), please consider the voting period varied to one week. > - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- > 2808c3bb-6d17-49b6-98c8-c6a0a24bc686 > [ ] Choice 1: The DPLs decision remains on hold until the full vote > [ ] Choice 2: Further discussion > - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- I believe the options should be: Choice 1: The DPL's withdrawal of the delegation remains on hold pending a vote Choice 2: The DPL's withdrawal of the delegation stands until a vote with no default option (or, since there is no quorum, Choice 2 being treated as the default option, which is equivalent). I'm not sure what all this is aiming to achieve beyond being a different attempt to effectively prevent me from exercising any DPL powers, and to further discourage people from having any faith in our constitutional processes. Cheers, aj
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature