Re: Debian Maintainers GR Proposal, alternative update
Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 04:05:57PM +0200, Steffen Joeris wrote:
>> I'd like to offer an alternative gr proposal. I read the whole thread (took me
>> most of the night :( ) and after some discussions on IRC, I come up with this
>> proposal.
>
> On Mon, Jul 09, 2007 at 08:33:20PM +0200, Bastian Venthur wrote:
>> Since I don't agree that we don't need a new class of contributors but
>> very much like the idea to grant some of the proposed DM rights to New
>> Maintainers after a certain point in their NM career, I propose a
>> different solution.
>
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 12:09:54AM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
>> So I'd gladly support/second a proposal in that direction. But like
>> said, your current one is too shy, and almost worthless as it's a
>> workaround for DAM delays, and not really a valuable improvement of
>> anything.
>
> Just a quick note -- the updated DM proposal's finished it's minimum
> discussion at this point by my count, so if there's some way of
> reconciling some of the alternative ideas to get an actual proposal, it
> might be good to get that done so it can be an alternative on the ballot.
I don't see how I could merge Steffen's proposal with mine. My main
problem with Steffen's proposal and yours is that I'm strictly against
the new DM class as an alternative to the DD (for reasons, I've already
explained in related threads on this list), but still see the need for a
more motivating NM process.
Maybe we could just add both alternatives to the ballot? :P
Cheers,
Bastian
--
Bastian Venthur http://venthur.de
Debian Developer venthur at debian org
Reply to: