Hello Scott, On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 07:04:02PM -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote: > Yes, but all your proposed GR does is move the problem one definition > to the right. I don't follow this objection. The SC is not meant to contain exhaustive details of policies. At present, though, I think it goes too far the other way. This GR is intended to nudge it closer to the right level of detail. > Are you aware of any newcomers that have been negatively affected this > way? I'm not. I could imagine it happening to a younger version of myself, though. -- Sean Whitton
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature