Re: Last minute cominbations G+D and/or G+E
On 2019/12/04 19:14, Ian Jackson wrote:
...
> 7. Software is not to be considered to be designed by upstream to work
> exclusively with systemd merely because upstream does not provide,
> and/or will not accept, an init script.
I believe that the combination is better than the original individual
proposals. Have the original submitters consented to such a merge? I
think that would be an important blocker before I could second this. If
this merge would go ahead, I assume all the existing seconds would fall
away and it would need new seconds.
For the record, I don't mean to put any pressure on the secretary
whatsoever to extend any deadline, I think there is enough options to
put together a vote that can produce results that will be reflective of
where we stand as a community, but I think with the proposed merge it
would be a bit better and shouldn't delay things by much.
And on a personal note, I think at some point you also need to let it be
so that you don't lose any sleep about it and not forget to take care of
yourself*.
-Jonathan
*Which is rich coming from me, because I've mulled a lot of the recent
discussions in my head when I should have been sleeping myself.
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Jonathan Carter (highvoltage) <jcc>
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian Developer - https://wiki.debian.org/highvoltage
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ https://debian.org | https://jonathancarter.org
⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ Be Bold. Be brave. Debian has got your back.
Reply to: