>>>>> "Kurt" == Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> writes:
Kurt> On Mon, Mar 07, 2022 at 03:12:57PM -0700, Sam Hartman wrote:
>> >>>>> "Judit" == Judit Foglszinger <urbec@riseup.net> writes:
>>
>> >> I think it would be clearer to add "that" between "confirm"
>> and >> "their":
>> >>
>> >> {+ public, but developers will be given an option to confirm
>> that >> their vote is included in the votes+} cast.
>>
Judit> I agree. It makes this option diverge a bit from the Option
Judit> A it was forked from, but since the meaning is not changed it
Judit> should be fine.
>>
>> Should I adopt the change as well or does it only make sense for
>> ballot option 2?
Kurt> Sam,
Kurt> Can you confirm that you would also like this change?
I decline; it's too late to do without a chance of getting something
wrong.
I should have prepared a new commit a couple days ago and confirmed
there are no objections.
The way my option is worded, I'd need to generate a new commit hash,
confirm that it didn't include any extra changes etc.
It's too late to do that and I think the text is correct either way.
In US English, "that" is optional in that sentence.
I don't know what UK rules would say.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature