Re: wine5.0 in buster-backports
Thanks for the advice.
For me the wine stable packages have been good enough and I clearly prefer to
get something from debian-backports compared to a third party repo.
Nevertheless good that there is another source for packages.
Thanks
Rainer
Am Sonntag, 19. Juli 2020, 13:14:28 CEST schrieb Berillions:
> Wine package from Debian are very bad ...
> Now 99% of people use Wine-Staging and maintainer don’t want to package it.
> And this is still wine-devel 5.5 while the latest release is 5.12.
>
> Envoyé de mon iPhone
>
> > Le 19 juil. 2020 à 13:06, Rainer Dorsch <ml@bokomoko.de> a écrit :
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I run buster and need wine 5.0. I built the bullseye packages for buster:
> >
> > I compiled the bullseye source package on my amd64 buster system locally
> > (dpkg-buildpackage -us -uc). As build dependencies I first had to build
> > libfaudio0 from bullseye. But this was super small (at least for wine
> > standards).
> >
> > It compiled and runs flawless on buster for me.
> >
> > The 32bit part (wine32) was more complicated:
> > - I setup a chroot for buster:i386
> > - Installed build dependencies like for amd64 (for whatever reason I did
> > not need libfaudio here?)
> > - run wine build in i386 buster chroot (dpkg-buildpackage -us -uc)
> > - installed wine32:i386, libwine:i386, libfaudio0:i386, and a bunch of
> > other i386 dependencies of buster.
> >
> > Impressive that this all worked flawless and it shows the quality of
> > Debian and your great work :-)
> >
> > Nevertheless it took me a few hours :-/
> >
> > To save the work for other Debian user (or enable wine 5.0 in case they
> > cannot compile), would it be possible to provide wine 5.0 officially
> > through buster- backports? It seems it is just required to also backport
> > faudio, which is small and compiles without any issues and which seems to
> > be already maintained by the Debian wine team.
> >
> > Many thanks for your great work :-)
> > Rainer
--
Rainer Dorsch
http://bokomoko.de/
Reply to: