Hi,
Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> I will not sponsor you in the typical way, where you are tagged as the
> maintainer of the package (I believe that praxis to be broken: you do
> not have access to all developer tools, and our structures do not
err? what exactly? He has all the packages, BTS, PTS, etc available.
> support getting hold of you in case of problems). Instead, I will adopt
uh? He gets the BTS mails, you know his email etc.
> the package and work with you on the packaging, and when you are a
> developer and I (most probably) still feel confident that you are
To becoming a developer he need to have a own package already. If you
are Maintainer: he doesn't have one.
> capable of maintaining it properly, I will hand the maintainership over
> to you.
>
> Does that sound fair to you?
It looks fundamentally broken. Just sponsor it the normal way.
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`. `' rene@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73
`- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature