[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#459753: marked as done (RFP: btk-core -- Biomolecule Toolkit C++ library)

Your message dated Fri, 12 Aug 2016 09:56:19 +0000
with message-id <E1bY9CN-0001oF-D2@quantz.debian.org>
and subject line closing RFP: btk-core -- Biomolecule Toolkit C++ library
has caused the Debian Bug report #459753,
regarding RFP: btk-core -- Biomolecule Toolkit C++ library
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
459753: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=459753
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Morten Kjeldgaard <mok@bioxray.au.dk>


* Package name    : btk-core
  Version         : 0.8.1
  Upstream Author : Tim Robertson (kid50@users.sourceforge.net> 
* URL             : http://sourceforge.net/projects/btk/
* License         : GPL
  Programming Lang: C++
  Description     : biomolecule Toolkit C++ library
   The Biomolecule Toolkit is a library for modeling biological
   macromolecules such as proteins, DNA and RNA. It provides a C++ interface
   for common tasks in structural biology to facilitate the development of
   molecular modeling, design and analysis tools.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-3-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_DK.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_DK.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
RFP 459753 has no visible progress for a long time, so closing.

--- End Message ---
Reply to: