[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#461508: marked as done (RFP: treeplot -- Phylogenetic tree file converter)



Your message dated Fri, 12 Aug 2016 09:56:24 +0000
with message-id <E1bY9CS-0001wC-KA@quantz.debian.org>
and subject line closing RFP: treeplot -- Phylogenetic tree file converter
has caused the Debian Bug report #461508,
regarding RFP: treeplot -- Phylogenetic tree file converter
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
461508: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=461508
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Charles Plessy <charles-debian-nospam@plessy.org>

  Package name    : treeplot
  Version         : 0.7
  Upstream Author : Olivier Langella
  URL             : http://www.pge.cnrs-gif.fr/bioinfo/treeplot/ (invalid)
  License         : GPL
  Programming Lang: C++
  Description     : Phylogenetic tree file converter

 Treeplot is a conversion tool, from "Phylip" phylogenetic tree file to
 Postscript (.ps), Adobe Illustrator (.ai), Scalable Vector Graphic
 (.svg), Computer Graphic Metafile(.cgm), Hewlet Packard Graphic Language
 (.hpgl), xfig file (.fig), gif image file(.gif), PBM Portable aNy Map
 file (.pnm)

The package is already ready: it was prepared by Vincent Danjean, who
offered it to the Debian-Med packaging team.

http://www-id.imag.fr/Laboratoire/Membres/Danjean_Vincent/deb.html#treeplot

Have a nice day,

-- 
Charles Plessy



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
RFP 461508 has no visible progress for a long time, so closing.

--- End Message ---

Reply to: