> I personally find that "gh" is quite short name for a package that > will go into a general purpose software catalog like Debian repository. Would > you mind choosing something like "github-cli" as source and binary > package name and mentioning the sortcut "gh" in a package description? > So anyone could find the program by means of `apt-cache search`. > Acronyms gh and gn (which stands for Google's Generate Ninja) are > visually similar, and I'm afraid they are easily confused. > > What do you make of this proposal? I like that proposal and think it makes a lot of sense. `gh` does seem too short, and while easy to identify for current gh users, maybe it will be more difficult to find in apt for new users. Also, as you mentioned, a namespace clash in the future seems like an uncommon occurence. -- Best regards, Brian T
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature