[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1035656: ITP: ruby-ruby-openai -- OpenAI API + Ruby! 🤖❤️





On 08/05/23 12:26 pm, Sandro Tosi wrote:
On Mon, May 8, 2023 at 2:02 AM Praveen Arimbrathodiyil
<praveen@onenetbeyond.org> wrote:



On 08/05/23 10:22 am, Sandro Tosi wrote:
On Sun, 7 May 2023 14:37:35 +0530 Praveen Arimbrathodiyil
<praveen@onenetbeyond.org> wrote:
Package: wnpp
severity: wishlist
Owner: Pirate Praveen <praveen@debian.org>

Package https://rubygems.org/gems/ruby-openai (License: Expat)


why the double ruby- prefix?

Because the gem name is ruby-openai. We used to skip double ruby prefix
earlier, but we have changed that practice now.

this seems like a step in the wrong direction, and it would be fixed.
a double prefix provides no benefits, confuses people and it's
probably only something the ruby team does (AFAIK); i believe it
should be just `ruby-openai`

There are cases when we have to differentiate between two gems like this

https://rubygems.org/gems/parser
https://rubygems.org/gems/ruby_parser

node also uses this practice when upstream module include node- in it.

are emojis really needed in the package
description?

I just kept the upstream description. It could be removed if that is a
problem.

the upstream description is quite poor, as the Debian maintainer you
should provide a better one; and at the same time remove the emojis,
as they provide no value in describing what the package does (which is
the sole purpose of the Description field)

Just like other bugs, you can file a bug with appropriate severity and even offer a patch. This is uploaded already, and can be considered in the next upload (once accepted).

Attachment: OpenPGP_0x8F53E0193B294B75.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Reply to: