[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1052071:




De: Nilson Silva <nilsonfsilva@hotmail.com>
Enviado: segunda-feira, 18 de setembro de 2023 12:12
Para: Yadd <yadd@debian.org>
Assunto: RE: built-in packages: esniff in tad
 
Hi Yadd!

> Do you know `pkgjs-depends` ? Very helpful for such search
Good to know that this tool exists. I'll try it. Thanks

> I still don't understand what you want to do
I'm sorry if I didn't make myself understood. And sometimes translators don't help either.
But that's how I discovered the situation

1. Debi
Selecting previously unselected node-esniff package.
(Reading database... 75473 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to unpack node-esniff_1.1.0+dfsg-1_all.deb ...
Unpacking node-esniff (1.1.0+dfsg-1) ...
dpkg: error processing file node-esniff_1.1.0+dfsg-1_all.deb (--install):
 trying to replace '/usr/share/nodejs/esniff/accessed-properties.js' which is also in the tad 3.1.0+~cs10.23.44-1 package
Errors were found during processing:
 node-esniff_1.1.0+dfsg-1_all.deb
debi: error: subprocess dpkg -i node-esniff_1.1.0+dfsg-1_all.deb returned exit status

2. apt install node-esniff
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Reading status information... Done
Note, selecting 'tad' instead of 'node-esniff'
tad is already the latest version (3.1.0+~cs10.23.44-1).
0 updated, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not updated

> Ftpmasters asked us to no more package "too-little node module". Then we
>started to embed little package in bigger ones but in this case, the
> global package exports all names. Then you can require node-esniff in
> any debian/control.
> Then even if we disassemble the package to have a separate node-esniff, no changes.
It was good to know that. This will be a guide for my packages. Thanks

> For now, node-tad is not used by any package, not even esniff. Then
> multiplying source packages without real use is not interesting.
You are sure!

> JS Team is a team, I'm not owner of any package.
Clear. I expressed myself wrong. I wanted to say that since you are also the maintainer,
you have the right to decide about the package

> What is your goal with esniff ? Is it a need for building an interesting package?
Yes. It's a package I want to bring to Debian.
But I don't know if it's interesting in your eyes. I'll get it ready. When I'm ready, I'll submit
it for you to take a look at.

But thank you very much for everything

Best wishes
Nilson F. Silva






Reply to: