[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1036926: marked as done (ITP: lxd-ui -- A browser interface for LXD)

Your message dated Wed, 13 Dec 2023 22:23:26 +0000
with message-id <c3bedf5b2d7cb71d0bfd06ec2be29d08cfb2fe09.camel@debian.org>
and subject line Close ITPs
has caused the Debian Bug report #1036926,
regarding ITP: lxd-ui -- A browser interface for LXD
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1036926: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1036926
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mathias Gibbens <gibmat@debian.org>
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org

* Package name    : lxd-ui
  Version         : 0.0~git20230526.416dc86
  Upstream Author : Canonical
* URL             : https://github.com/canonical/lxd-ui
* License         : GPL-3
  Programming Lang: HTML, JavaScript, TypeScript
  Description     : A browser interface for LXD

 LXD-UI is a browser frontend for LXD. It enables easy and
 accessible container and virtual machine management. Targets
 small and large scale private clouds.

Canonical is working on a web-based GUI for LXD that would be useful to
have available in Debian. There's another third-party project
(LXDWARE's lxd-dashboard) as well -- I haven't directly compared the
two projects in too much depth, but I would expect Canonical's version
to likely end up the best integrated and supported.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
  Due to Canonical's recent actions relicensing LXD and adding a new
CLA requirement (see
https://stgraber.org/2023/12/12/lxd-now-re-licensed-and-under-a-cla/),
I am no longer motivated to work on this ITP.

  If there is renewed interest at some point in the future, please feel
free to reopen the bug and assign to yourself.

Mathias

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


--- End Message ---
Reply to: