[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#621490: marked as done (packages.debian.org: information missing http://packages.debian.org/sid/deroff (debports pkg))



Your message dated Sat, 11 Mar 2017 14:24:43 +0800
with message-id <1489213483.27304.12.camel@debian.org>
and subject line Re: www.debian.org: package information missing (to the right) at http://packages.debian.org/sid/deroff
has caused the Debian Bug report #621490,
regarding packages.debian.org: information missing http://packages.debian.org/sid/deroff (debports pkg)
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
621490: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=621490
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal


At page:

   http://packages.debian.org/sid/deroff

In section "links" to the right the usual "ChangeLog", "PTS" etc.  are
empty.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_DK.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_DK.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US.UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Thu, 07 Apr 2011 15:03:04 +0300 Jari Aalto wrote:

>    http://packages.debian.org/sid/deroff

This package has been removed from Debian a long time ago.

-- 
bye,
pabs

https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


--- End Message ---

Reply to: