[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: proposed X Strike Force commit/changelog policy



On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 08:49:32AM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> [hurried reply]
> 
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 12:22:01PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > The goal is NOT to make the package changelogs less massive.  The goal
> > is to make them more useful.  My package changelogs have been doing
> > double-duty for years because I didn't have them under revision control.
> > Now they simply need to do what a changelog should do -- log changes.
> 
> That's what I meant, really. Right now, some of the changelogs (like the
> 293-line changelog for 4.3.0-0ds4) are pretty unnavigable.

Well, I rudely purged your changelog entries from the 4.3.0/sid branch,
so I don't see them and they don't bother me.  :)

-- 
G. Branden Robinson                |          You live and learn.
Debian GNU/Linux                   |          Or you don't live long.
branden@debian.org                 |          -- Robert Heinlein
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |

Attachment: pgp36fkKYXS99.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: