[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1003498: watch file has typo in URL



Package: xdm
Version: 1:1.1.11-3+b2
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: rak@debian.org

There's a typo in the watch file, which means that uscan never noticed
the latest upstream release from 2 years ago:

https://xorg.freedesktop.orgreleases/individual/app/
                           ^^

-- System Information:
Debian Release: bookworm/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 5.15.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/16 CPU threads)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE, TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
Locale: LANG=en_CA.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_CA.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_CA:en
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages xdm depends on:
ii  cpp                    4:11.2.0-2
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]  1.5.79
ii  libc6                  2.33-2
ii  libcrypt1              1:4.4.27-1
ii  libpam0g               1.4.0-11
ii  libselinux1            3.3-1+b1
ii  libx11-6               2:1.7.2-2+b1
ii  libxau6                1:1.0.9-1
ii  libxaw7                2:1.0.13-1.1
ii  libxdmcp6              1:1.1.2-3
ii  libxext6               2:1.3.4-1
ii  libxft2                2.3.2-2
ii  libxinerama1           2:1.1.4-2
ii  libxmu6                2:1.1.2-2+b3
ii  libxpm4                1:3.5.12-1
ii  libxrender1            1:0.9.10-1
ii  libxt6                 1:1.2.0-1
ii  lsb-base               11.1.0
ii  procps                 2:3.3.17-5
ii  x11-utils              7.7+5
ii  x11-xserver-utils      7.7+9

xdm recommends no packages.

xdm suggests no packages.

-- debconf information:
  xdm/stop_running_server_with_children: false
* shared/default-x-display-manager: xdm
  xdm/daemon_name: /usr/bin/xdm

-- 
|)|/  Ryan Kavanagh  | 4E46 9519 ED67 7734 268F
|\|\  https://rak.ac | BD95 8F7B F8FC 4A11 C97A

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: