Re: xfce4-screensaver
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
On Tue, 2019-01-01 at 17:08 +0200, Jonathan Carter wrote:
> So, since it's in beta now, any specific objection against having the
> latest version in experimental, not maintained by the debian-xfce team?
Yes, can you hold off a little on this? I'd really like to have a clear status
on a locker for Xfce in buster.
I've started experiencing trouble with light-locker when /proc is mounted with
hidepid=2 (#892290) and looking at all the code copy/pasted from gnome-
screensaver and abandoned since makes me a bit sad.
I'll try to reach out to Peter but light-locker looks a bit unmaintained. It's
too late for Buster but it might be worth having options for Bullseye (if we
can have some kind of long-term commitment that xfce4-screensaver will be
maintained).
Regards,
- --
Yves-Alexis
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEE8vi34Qgfo83x35gF3rYcyPpXRFsFAlwtzboACgkQ3rYcyPpX
RFvIKgf/SHNVgC2djwmF+CxI+ZGVByCRMSnRrru/zfqw88lDo00FQfWh/6AHAdDw
W7+dL0tw/z1CkHR6yIBm0LeNn/HZup31avUZk4VEuRGdOoEKDjUowmSnpy7rhgJI
s5U335SGbNPgpoXJZ6q5WEDP2hqQZxg47anML92FPEe0Ozho8K11+45IdXrUpbC7
Otu7hWzvlUOkWln0UhHWkZJoLOACBfRm+l6oLlmI8uemhCBPDhdRSMOQ3zeBfP5W
Kp6PK8WZ/S3W/DZPZb7d8RR+NiMomVtxpbjTd8Kkny1Y2SIrjy+qd2jsqHWCUZqh
b9tZDTC/lFCKT59Etb0q+385WJAVOw==
=aYoW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: