[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#919348: marked as done (xfce4-screensaver: Accidental upload to unstable while fixing bug #919151)

Your message dated Tue, 11 Jul 2023 11:21:00 +0200
with message-id <ZK0e/DuWS/L6EpUq@corsac.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#919348: many new releases since -- still "too buggy"?
has caused the Debian Bug report #919348,
regarding xfce4-screensaver: Accidental upload to unstable while fixing bug #919151
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
919348: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=919348
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: xfce4-screensaver
Version: 0.1.3-1
Severity: important

While fixing #919151, I uploaded this package to unstable when
it was meant to go to experimental.

This package is still beta and security-wise, we don't consider
it quite ready yet to support in a stable release.

So we're filing an RC bug to prevent it from migrating to testing,
this can be closed once buster is frozen.

-- 
  ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀  Jonathan Carter (highvoltage) <jcc>
  ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁  Debian Developer - https://wiki.debian.org/highvoltage
  ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋   https://debian.org | https://jonathancarter.org
  ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀  Be Bold. Be brave. Debian has got your back.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 07:59:33PM +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> On Thu, 2021-02-04 at 14:43 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > Yves-Alexis, do you have any objections to closing this bug now?
> 
> Yes. I have xfce4-screensaver (4.16) running on a Debian sid install and it
> still happens every once in a while that the desktop of the locked box appears
> (for example at resume). I'm still not confident it should actually be used on
> a production install it's just not robust enough, but I don't have the time or
> motivation to investigate and fix it myself.

Now that we are at 4.18.2 and at the beginning of the Trixie release
cycle, and after a quick chat with Unit193, we decided to close this bug
and let xfce4-screensaver migrate to testing so it gets a little bit
more exposure.

It'd be really helpful if people could report all bugs they identify
(whether by using it or looking at the code), especially security-wise
(crashes leaving the desktop open, screen not blanking etc.)

We're not changing the default locker for Xfce for now.

Regards,
-- 
Yves-Alexis

--- End Message ---
Reply to: