Bug#35571: marked as done (apt: getting CDROM's label)
Your message dated Wed, 12 May 1999 20:42:56 -0600 (MDT)
with message-id <Pine.LNX.3.96.990512195153.15981I-100000@Wakko.deltatee.com>
and subject line Fixed in the new upload
has caused the attached bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I'm
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Ian Jackson
(administrator, Debian bugs database)
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Apr 1999 08:37:15 +0000
Received: (qmail 9266 invoked from network); 5 Apr 1999 08:37:15 -0000
Received: from r-vicenza2.keycomm.it (root@194.184.117.3)
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 5 Apr 1999 08:37:15 -0000
Received: from venus.dalla.net (root@ppp-vi31.keycomm.it [194.184.117.166])
by r-vicenza2.keycomm.it (8.9.1a/8.9.1/Debian/GNU) with ESMTP id KAA28576;
Mon, 5 Apr 1999 10:37:04 +0200
Received: (from dalla@localhost)
by venus.dalla.net (8.8.8/8.8.8/Debian/GNU) id AAA06098;
Mon, 5 Apr 1999 00:21:50 +0200
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 1999 00:21:50 +0200
Message-Id: <199904042221.AAA06098@venus.dalla.net>
From: Michele Dalla Silvestra <dalla@pluto.linux.it>
Subject: apt: getting CDROM's label
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Mailer: bug 3.1.7
Package: apt
Version: 0.3.3
dpkg-multicd and many other methods, assume as default that default tree
for Debian's CDROM is $MOUNTPOINT/debian/dists/...., dpkg-multicd search CD
label in $MOUNTPOINT/debian/.disk/info, but apt-cdrom search CD label in
$MOUNTPOINT/.disk/info.
-- System Information
Debian Release: 2.0
Kernel Version: Linux venus 2.0.33 #1 Mon Jun 1 08:35:42 CEST 1998 i586 unknown
Versions of the packages apt depends on:
ii libc6 2.0.7u-6 The GNU C library version 2 (run-time files)
ii libstdc++2.9 2.91.60-2 The GNU stdc++ library (egcs version)
Reply to: