Re: Gnome-apt and apt 0.3.1
On Fri, 5 Mar 1999, Mitch Blevins wrote:
> > We need to make the APT package provide the virtual package libapt-pkg2.1
> > and then have gnome-apt depend on that instead. Please do that if you are
> > going to do anything..
>
> I have deliberately avoided touching anything in the apt cvs tree. Does
> this mean that I have permission to change the control files for apt in
> cvs? (Don't wanna piss anybody off)
Sure go crazy, but if you make an error we get to tar and feather you :>
Just keep the changelog uptodate and be sure the provides: is in sync..
Jason
Reply to: