Re: lprng

[Pann McCuaig <pann@ourmanpann.com>]

On Sun, May 14, 2000 at 23:44, Karl M. Hegbloom wrote:
> >>>>> "Philip" == Philip Charles <philipc@copyleft.co.nz> writes:
> 
>     Philip> I have previously mentioned that lp, gs, magicfilter & libpaperg
>     Philip> are not included either.  We need to ensure that the crass newbie gets
>     Philip> everything needed.
> 
>  I think that `lprng' should be the one included, since it's the one
>  I've had the best luck with.  Anyone else agree?

I've never had a problem with lpr. Not the case with lprng (although
it's been as far back as bo). Of course, YMMV, but I see no compelling
reason to change.

Cheers,
 Pann
-- 
geek by nature, Linux by choice                     L I N U X       .~.
                                                    The Choice      /V\
http://www.ourmanpann.com/linux/                     of a GNU      /( )\
                                                    Generation     ^^-^^