Bug#136003: marked as done (apt-get {clean,autoclean} Should Implement --list-cleanup)
Your message dated Wed, 27 Feb 2002 21:49:48 -0700 (MST)
with message-id <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.1020227214848.31937K-100000@wakko.debian.net>
and subject line Bug#136003: apt-get {clean,autoclean} Should Implement --list-cleanup
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Feb 2002 07:51:50 +0000
>From jbucata@earthlink.net Wed Feb 27 01:51:50 2002
Return-path: <jbucata@earthlink.net>
Received: from harrier.mail.pas.earthlink.net (harrier.prod.itd.earthlink.net) [207.217.120.12]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16fysQ-0002F8-00; Wed, 27 Feb 2002 01:51:50 -0600
Received: from user-v3qs4mu.dialup.mindspring.com ([199.174.18.222] helo=blimpchess)
by harrier.prod.itd.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1)
id 16fysP-0007ZB-00
for submit@bugs.debian.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2002 23:51:49 -0800
Received: from bucata by blimpchess with local (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
id 16fysL-0000ea-00
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Wed, 27 Feb 2002 01:51:45 -0600
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2002 01:51:45 -0600
From: Jason Bucata <jbucata@earthlink.net>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: apt-get {clean,autoclean} Should Implement --list-cleanup
Message-ID: <[🔎] 20020227075145.GA2496@earthlink.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i
Sender: Jason Bucata <jbucata@earthlink.net>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Package: apt
Version: 0.5.4
Severity: wishlist
apt-get clean and apt-get autoclean should support --list-cleanup,
instead of only doing --list-cleanup during apt-get update.
Jason B.
--
Kindness has converted more sinners than zeal, eloquence, or learning.
-- Frederick W. Faber, British theologian
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 136003-done) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Feb 2002 04:49:49 +0000
>From jgg@debian.org Wed Feb 27 22:49:49 2002
Return-path: <jgg@debian.org>
Received: from skip-ext.ab.videon.ca [206.75.216.36]
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16gIVp-0007n3-00; Wed, 27 Feb 2002 22:49:49 -0600
Received: (qmail 204 invoked from network); 28 Feb 2002 04:49:48 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO wakko.debian.net) ([24.86.210.128]) (envelope-sender <jgg@debian.org>)
by skip-ext.ab.videon.ca (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP
for <jbucata@earthlink.net>; 28 Feb 2002 04:49:48 -0000
Received: from localhost
([127.0.0.1] helo=wakko.debian.net ident=jgg)
by wakko.debian.net with smtp (Exim 3.16 #1 (Debian))
id 16gIVo-0008Pz-00; Wed, 27 Feb 2002 21:49:48 -0700
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2002 21:49:48 -0700 (MST)
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@debian.org>
X-Sender: jgg@wakko.debian.net
To: Jason Bucata <jbucata@earthlink.net>, 136003-done@bugs.debian.org
cc: APT Development Team <deity@lists.debian.org>, apt@packages.qa.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#136003: apt-get {clean,autoclean} Should Implement --list-cleanup
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 20020227075145.GA2496@earthlink.net>
Message-ID: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.1020227214848.31937K-100000@wakko.debian.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: 136003-done@bugs.debian.org
On Wed, 27 Feb 2002, Jason Bucata wrote:
> apt-get clean and apt-get autoclean should support --list-cleanup,
> instead of only doing --list-cleanup during apt-get update.
list-cleanup is only meaningful if you change the sources.list file, if
you do that then it is necessary to re-run update. The only reason the
--list-cleanup option exists at all is so that people can go
--no-list-cleanup which is actually slightly usefull..
Jason
Reply to: