Bug#205037: marked as done (/usr/share/man/man5/apt.conf.5.gz: talks about the apt.conf file but user just finds a directory)
Your message dated Tue, 12 Aug 2003 12:18:40 -0500 (CDT)
with message-id <Pine.LNX.4.44.0308121218090.20044-100000@gradall.private.brainfood.com>
and subject line Bug#205037: /usr/share/man/man5/apt.conf.5.gz: talks about the apt.conf file but user just finds a directory
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Aug 2003 05:40:59 +0000
>From jidanni@jidanni.org Tue Aug 12 00:40:49 2003
Return-path: <jidanni@jidanni.org>
Received: from smtp1.apol.com.tw (smtp.apol.com.tw) [203.79.224.62]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19mRtp-0001Za-00; Tue, 12 Aug 2003 00:40:49 -0500
Received: from debian (tc218-187-76-219.2-4.pl.apol.com.tw [218.187.76.219])
by smtp.apol.com.tw (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DBB81040544
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Tue, 12 Aug 2003 13:40:47 +0800 (CST)
Received: from jidanni by debian with local (Exim 4.20)
id 19mP4a-0000Ka-GL; Tue, 12 Aug 2003 10:39:44 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="BIG5"
From: Dan Jacobson <jidanni@jidanni.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: /usr/share/man/man5/apt.conf.5.gz: talks about the apt.conf file but user
just finds a directory
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.20
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 10:39:44 +0800
Message-Id: <[🔎] E19mP4a-0000Ka-GL@debian>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.7 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_20,DATE_IN_PAST_03_06,HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: apt
Version: 0.5.9
Severity: minor
File: /usr/share/man/man5/apt.conf.5.gz
At many places in the man page you refer to a apt.conf file. You
should mention apt.conf.d instead, as that is what users find these days.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 205037-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Aug 2003 17:19:14 +0000
>From doogie@debian.org Tue Aug 12 12:19:12 2003
Return-path: <doogie@debian.org>
Received: from boof.brainfood.com (gradall.private.brainfood.com) [146.82.138.61]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19mcng-0007My-00; Tue, 12 Aug 2003 12:19:12 -0500
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] ident=adam)
by gradall.private.brainfood.com with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 19mcnA-0006QZ-00; Tue, 12 Aug 2003 12:18:40 -0500
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 12:18:40 -0500 (CDT)
From: Adam Heath <doogie@debian.org>
X-X-Sender: adam@gradall.private.brainfood.com
To: Dan Jacobson <jidanni@jidanni.org>, <205037-done@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: Re: Bug#205037: /usr/share/man/man5/apt.conf.5.gz: talks about the
apt.conf file but user just finds a directory
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] E19mP4a-0000Ka-GL@debian>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0308121218090.20044-100000@gradall.private.brainfood.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: 205037-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-15.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_20,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,
REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,USER_AGENT_PINE
autolearn=ham version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
On Tue, 12 Aug 2003, Dan Jacobson wrote:
> At many places in the man page you refer to a apt.conf file. You
> should mention apt.conf.d instead, as that is what users find these days.
Nope. You can use both, it's just apt doesn't need an apt.conf file by
default, as it's defaults are sane.
Reply to: