[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#202489: marked as done (/usr/bin/apt-get: add size limits for (dist-)upgrade)



Your message dated Tue, 19 Aug 2003 23:11:24 -0400
with message-id <20030820031123.GR3068@alcor.net>
and subject line /usr/bin/apt-get: add size limits for (dist-)upgrade
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Jul 2003 21:42:50 +0000
>From jidanni@jidanni.org Tue Jul 22 16:42:40 2003
Return-path: <jidanni@jidanni.org>
Received: from tx.symonds.net [64.246.28.87] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 19f4u8-0001Js-00; Tue, 22 Jul 2003 16:42:40 -0500
Received: from tc210-203-44-200.3-16.pl.ebtnet.net ([210.203.44.200] helo=debian)
	by tx.symonds.net with asmtp (Exim 4.04)
	id 19f4u5-0007z4-00
	for submit@bugs.debian.org; Tue, 22 Jul 2003 17:42:39 -0400
Received: from jidanni by debian with local (Exim 4.20)
	id 19f41f-0000rs-QQ; Wed, 23 Jul 2003 04:46:23 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="BIG5"
From: Dan Jacobson <jidanni@jidanni.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: /usr/bin/apt-get: add size limits for (dist-)upgrade
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.18
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 04:46:23 +0800
Message-Id: <E19f41f-0000rs-QQ@debian>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0
	tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE
	version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: apt
Version: 0.5.5.1
Severity: wishlist
File: /usr/bin/apt-get

Often one can estimate one has extra bandwidth for oh, one megabyte of
downloads on the next modem call.

What better way to use it than upgrading some packages.

But simply using apt-get dist-upgrade will get many megabytes, so it
would be nice if we could on the command line give apt-get a size
limit, telling it to find a nice combo of packages that won't exceed
one megabyte.  One could also specify one wants priority on the
smallest packages of the biggest packages, etc.


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 202489-done) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Aug 2003 03:11:26 +0000
>From mdz@csh.rit.edu Tue Aug 19 22:11:24 2003
Return-path: <mdz@csh.rit.edu>
Received: from smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.60] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 19pJNc-0001WB-00; Tue, 19 Aug 2003 22:11:24 -0500
Received: from 216-15-124-77.c3-0.smr-ubr3.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com ([216.15.124.77] helo=mizar.alcor.net)
	by smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #4)
	id 19pJNc-0004KL-00
	for 202489-done@bugs.debian.org; Tue, 19 Aug 2003 23:11:24 -0400
Received: from mdz by mizar.alcor.net with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 19pJNc-0001VN-00
	for <202489-done@bugs.debian.org>; Tue, 19 Aug 2003 23:11:24 -0400
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 23:11:24 -0400
From: Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org>
To: 202489-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: /usr/bin/apt-get: add size limits for (dist-)upgrade
Message-ID: <20030820031123.GR3068@alcor.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Sender: Matt Zimmerman <mdz@alcor.net>
Delivered-To: 202489-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0
	tests=BAYES_01,USER_AGENT_MUTT
	version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_17
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_17 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

This is not generally useful, and would not be simple to implement.

-- 
 - mdz



Reply to: